Monday
24Aug2009

Health Care, Right or Privilege?

 

With all the latest controversy, anger, misinformation, poor questioning, poor answering the idea of health care has broken down and off the rails through the debates, Television journalism, the Internet and of course town halls. Currently we know that there is currently multiple bills being formed only by congress, the legislative branch over the issue of health care. There are no death panels as claimed and withdrawn by Sarah Palin over Facebook. Betsy McCaughey takes one of the health care bills writing out of context as seen on The Daily Show which the extended interview is posted on The Daily Show's website. With all this damage how can health care get back on track to enable a thoughtful discussion and can relate to individuals? While there are multiple ways to answer this question the first thing the American citizen needs to ask themselves if health care should become a right.

 

To start off let us understand the difference between rights and privileges because the word right has been thrown around so much that individuals truly do not know their rights and legislation that supports their rights. A privilege as defined by Merriam-Webster as a noun states, “a right or immunity granted as a peculiar benefit, advantage, or favor ; especially : such a right or immunity attached specifically to a position or an office”(http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/privilege) Privileges are considered benefits to being part of society, or organization. An example of a privilege would be a farmer creating a personal barn for a horse while the rest of the horses have to share a single barn. The farmer doesn't have to create a personal barn for that one horse so the prize horse is getting a privilege. A right as defined by Merriam-Webster dictionary as the word right is written as a noun under section 2a. “2 : something to which one has a just claim: as a : the power or privilege to which one is justly entitled <voting rights> <his right to decide>” (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/right). Some examples of American rights can be seen in the Bill of Rights, the two most famous being the right to free speech and the right to bear arms.

 

However the Bill of Rights has gone under some major changes over the years and has been amended to add on new rights. So far as a nation there have been seventeen additional amendments to the original ten. These amendments have created new rights for Americans that previously did not exist, for example the fifteenth amendment.

Section 1.The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude--Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation (http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_amendments_11-27.html)

The right to vote has been expanded and many new rights in our country have been created thanks to all three branches of government. The most powerful ability the United States government has is that legislation can be created, removed, and most importantly adjusted. No law in our federal or state governments are set in stone, people have the ability to create and advocate for new laws or the adjustment or removal of existing laws. What does all this explanation and definition of rights and privileges mean for the great health care debate of our time?

 

It is this question that will fix and bring health care back on track and create a foundation in where the discussion of health care can be analyzed. This should be the starting point to argue for or against health care reform because this question requires explanation and goes past any of the current hot topic statements being shouted by the crowds be it death panels, Nazi comparisons, a changing and cost of health care reform. Right now health care needs this question answered first because the United States, corporations and it's people treat health care as both a right and a privilege.

Health care is currently treated as a privilege in the United States, the benefit of having access to a doctor, dentist, optometrist and other health care physicians are only accessible to those who are employed. However employees with preexisting conditions could prevent an employee from having access to the health care that employee is paying. Health care through companies can limit, restrict or increase costs from the consumer and can limit the amount of coverage. If the consumer cannot afford the cost of treatment then health care is denied.

 

On the other side health care in the United States is also treated as a right. This is an common situation that affects those people who go to the emergency room because the people do not have health insurance or is not covered by their health care provider. Doctors cannot refuse treatment of those who are critically ill or injured regardless of the individual. During a crisis people aid those who are in poor health and would be considered inhumane to let another person suffer and not try to get medical treatment.

 

The United States has had to make some tough choices in our history that would change the United States. The founders of our nation made the tough choice to start a revolution and gain their independence. Our nation became divided in a civil war where slavery or servitude could no longer exist. Our nation would no longer deny a citizen's right to vote on the account of their color or creed. The Women's Suffrage movement convinced our nation to enable women the right to vote. Brave teenagers who fought and died protecting the United States and the world from tyranny were now able to vote at the age of eighteen.

 

Now is the time for the United States to make another tough choice. Does our nation believe health care is a privilege where only those who can afford treatment get treatment or does our nation believe that health care is a right where every man, woman and child regardless of color, creed, or age should be able to receive treatment?

 

Thursday
20Aug2009

Activision decides to raise the price of Call of Duty:Modern Warfare 2

This is simply a response that I posted on the Escapist forums after reading this news story.

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/94013-Modern-Warfare-2-PC-Pricier-Than-Expected

 

Reasons as of late on why the price change is not a good idea.

1.Inflation- This is the obvious move by Activision and anyone who has played video games for a main hobby and is an aware consumer. Both the planned price hike in Europe and now the PC title is a new pricing strategy to test if the modern consumer(which we here are in a minority) will be willing to purchase the PC version for the same amount as the console games. If the pricing is successful and meet their quota you can expect more games to cost even more in the future.

This from a consumer standpoint is a bad move. Remember as consumers the only thing a consumer can flex against companies is their wallets and by buying products we as consumers enable bad business behavior just like any other industry. Those who make the argument "It is only ten more dollars" do not realize that they are defending the negative business practices of the company and their ability to control pricing. If there is any problem with the video game industry and the cost of games then the model of which consumers buy consoles and games as a whole need to be looked at. Right now an average american consumer's wages has not increased with the actual cost of products of today.

2.Content- It is this generation and only this generation in which there are reasons why charging the same amount for a PC or a console game is not fair. The answer is content, distribution and online services. First let's talk about content. This generation has really changed the way PC gamers have been able to get content and I do not mean patches, I mean the full version of a game. The easiest example and relates to digital distribution shows itself on Steam and the many games PC consumers can get their games.

Let's take a look at the game Overlord II and Ghostbusters and compare it to the console version.

PC games
Overlord 2: http://store.steampowered.com/app/12810/
http://www.gamestop.com/Catalog/ProductDetails.aspx?product_id=72876
Ghostbusters: http://www.gamestop.com/Catalog/ProductDetails.aspx?product_id=73008
http://store.steampowered.com/app/9870/

Console
Overlord 2: http://www.gamestop.com/Catalog/ProductDetails.aspx?product_id=72877
Ghostbusters: http://www.gamestop.com/Catalog/ProductDetails.aspx?product_id=73003

Notice the major difference in price? However did you notice something else missing? Both of these games do not offer the ability to play multiplayer. So as of late there have been more games being developed and released for the PC consumer and are not getting the equal amount of content for the game and the same could be said for the console gamer as well when it comes to patches or being sold through DLC. The major difference is the model of online services between the consoles and PC which I will discuss in this next section. To wrap things up PC consumers for this generation normally have to wait for the game to be released longer than a console game like Street Fighter 4, or could get the game released on the same date but lack the same amount of content like Ghostbusters and Overlord 2. So there are legitimate reasons on why the pricing of console and PC games should not be equal.

3.Distribution- This generation has brought consoles and PCs very close together but the model of distribution still have some clear solid lines. Right now consumers have two choices when it comes to distribution: Digital distribution via downloads or Retail distribution which allows consumers to have a physical product. Now both consoles and PCs have used these methods but it is clear when it comes to the method and model of digital distribution do these two are very different.

Console games this generation have enjoyed for the first time the ability to allow consumers to download older games, movies, music, DLC and indie games. The model is currently being controlled not by the publisher or developer of the games console consumers buy but by the distributor which for consoles is Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft. The regulation and maintenance for all these services are put upon them. With this new responsibility also came the idea to profit from this new model which makes sense since they are hosting all the content from every developer, artist and publisher. Memberships such as Xbox live gold account exist to even fund the ability to allow consumers to play online for all the games they host including the Call of Duty Series. The responsibility has been taken off the developers and onto the distributor here and is beneficial to both parties. Developers no longer had to host their own servers for online gameplay and the distributor could create a profitable system to burden the massive amount of multiplayer games required to host for consumers.

First let me talk about the multiplayer for PC games before I get to distribution. PC games have sorta adopted this model but still isn't the main method. Games like Dawn of War 2 and Fallout 3 use the Games for Windows Live model in which hosting is done by Microsoft but the old method is still the primary. The primary model to host online gaming is performed by either the developer or publisher, or the consumers. Systems like Battle.net or Valve's Steam have servers to allow their consumers to play their games online where the main aspect of the game is to play with others online. Hosting costs nowhere near what Microsoft and Xbox live services because the hosting is limited to one game so it is illogical to charge a membership for a single game(MMO's withstanding). Could you imagine paying fifty USD just to play Warcraft 3?

Consumers for a very long time have had the ability to rent, own servers or personally host PC games from their own computer. Costs of hosting is taken upon the consumer or a group of consumers to enjoy their own game. There is no one paying for hosting aside from the consumers themselves. It is a popular model because of the ability to empower the consumer and learn new skills and take responsibility hosting and being an administrator. Games like TF2, L4D, the Battlefield series and many more are all hosted by consumers.

As for distribution this is where publishers and developers really get to save a lot and make a lot of money from PC gamers. Computers already have the ability to download a majority of services which Console online services offer so there is no need for publishers or developers to host or try to sell music or movies because there is already competition. So it all comes down the getting the games and there is even competition there. PC gamers can get their games from digital distributors such as Steam, Battle.net, Impulse, Greenhouse, Good Old Games and many more. Instead of having to create an absorbent amount of discs costs are saved by allowing PC consumers to download the game at the comfort of their own home. No shipping costs for the individual or the physical store, no production costs to create an actual disk. Think about how much money companies save by using this new model?

As a consumer, a member of the ECA, and as a gamer for the reasons stated above(which I could go further) that the price increase is unjustified, unfair and will weaken the consumer's power. If publishers wish to increase the cost of their games then the model of which consoles games are sold need to be looked at. There is no console a PC gamer has to purchase when playing a PC game.

Thursday
17Jul2008

Welcome to Squarespace!

Welcome to your new Squarespace site!  Below is a video that shows you how to get started using our system.

The three most important things to keep in mind:

  • The buttons in the top right allow you to interact with your site in different ways.  For instance, the 'A' icon represents content mode, which lets you edit journal entries and other content.  The 'Cube' Icon represents structure mode, which lets you add and organize pages.  Each mode is explained if you hover on the icon.

  • You can drag and drop anything on your site.  Want to move a page?  Enter structure mode and drag the page to a new location.  You can even drag pages between columns or from a column on to your top navigation bar.  Need to edit a journal entry?  Enter content mode and click 'Modify' on the entry you'd like to edit.

  • Our styles are presets that you can make your own.  Entering style mode on the upper right will let you edit any color, width, column arrangement, or banner and more.  Most editing is done from the Fonts & Colors tab of the style edtior menu.

Want to remove this entry?  Enter content mode by pressing the 'A' on the upper right, then press 'remove' next to the title of this entry.